For two decades, A.O. Scott held court as a respected film critic for the New York Times, his insightful reviews shaping cinematic discourse. But in a surprising career pivot, he’s taken on a new role: poetry critic. And in just five short months, he’s become a surprising champion for casual poetry appreciation.
Scott’s columns are a breath of fresh air in the sometimes stuffy world of literary criticism. He eschews the overly academic, favoring a relatable and engaging style that encourages readers to dive into poetry without feeling intimidated. He champions the simple joy of reading a poem, highlighting its beauty and emotional resonance without getting bogged down in dense theoretical analysis.
This accessible approach is refreshing. Too often, poetry is presented as an elite pursuit, requiring specialized knowledge and a deep understanding of literary history. Scott’s writing dismantles this perception, instead demonstrating that poetry can be enjoyed by everyone, regardless of their background or level of formal training. He makes the case that the beauty of a poem lies not just in its intricate structure or sophisticated vocabulary, but also in its ability to connect with our emotions and experiences.
His columns are filled with personal anecdotes and insightful observations, making the discussion of even complex poems feel approachable. He shows us how poetry can illuminate everyday life, offering unique perspectives on familiar themes and emotions. He deftly balances appreciation of technical skill with an emphasis on the emotional impact of a well-crafted poem.
Scott’s work is a powerful reminder that poetry doesn’t have to be a daunting task. It can be a source of joy, comfort, and profound understanding. By making poetry accessible to a wider audience, he’s not only broadened the appreciation for this art form but also redefined what it means to be a poetry critic in the 21st century. His work is a testament to the power of engaging writing and a celebration of the enduring beauty of poetry itself.
