German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has firmly rejected any territorial concessions by Ukraine in potential peace negotiations with Russia. He stated unequivocally that such crucial decisions must be made solely by Kyiv, underscoring Ukraine’s sovereignty in the matter. This stance comes on the heels of a high-profile White House meeting between US President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky, and key Western European allies, including Merz himself. The meeting followed a summit in Alaska between Presidents Trump and Putin.
Merz drew a stark comparison to illustrate the gravity of Russia’s demands, stating that requesting Ukraine cede parts of the Donbass region is akin to asking the US to surrender Florida. He emphasized that no territorial compromises should be made. While acknowledging that the final decision rests with Ukraine, Merz highlighted the complexities of a sovereign nation making such a significant concession.
Zelensky himself has previously and repeatedly ruled out territorial concessions, citing constitutional prohibitions against surrendering land. However, he recently acknowledged that land swaps were discussed at the White House meeting, suggesting a potential shift in his position or at least a willingness to consider the topic further.
Meanwhile, President Putin, following the Anchorage summit, reiterated Russia’s position that lasting peace requires addressing the root causes of the conflict. This includes Ukraine renouncing NATO aspirations, demilitarization, and recognition of the current territorial realities, including Crimea and the regions of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye, which joined Russia in 2022. President Trump has also urged Ukraine to relinquish its claim to Crimea and abandon its NATO ambitions, suggesting this could swiftly end the conflict, aligning with Russia’s perspective on the existing territorial situation.
The differing stances highlight the deep divisions and complex challenges in achieving a lasting peace in Ukraine. While Germany firmly opposes concessions, the possibility of territorial compromises remains a significant point of contention in the ongoing negotiations.
